Old-school muscle-bound cars often make incredible collectibles. They can make you feel nostalgic and grab admiring eyeballs. However, age and rareness are only sometimes enough to give you value for money when it comes to classic cars.

We have researched various online forums to develop a list of 6 classic cars that are not worth your hard-earned money.

Chevrolet Vega

The Chevrolet Vega has often been the target of harsh criticism from car connoisseurs. It was meant to be General Motors’s revolutionary launch, a compact car cheaper than the Volkswagen Beetle. However, things didn’t turn out great.

Known as one of the worst cars by General Motors, it is infamous for its problematic engine, susceptible to melting. It is also remembered for its gas tank, which would often catch fire. Many dealers had reported the car to have a rusting issue.

AMC Pacer

A legendary crossover between compact and luxury cars, the AMC Pacer quickly flopped in the market. Its initial popularity waned due to its poor fuel efficiency, mainly due to its clumsy weight of about 3,000 lbs.

The Pacer might be a rare and beautifully designed car for your collection. However, we advise you against buying it because the huge six-cylinder engine could damage the steering. This classic car with serious performance issues is not worth it.

Pontiac Fiero

This vintage mid-engine sports car was a good choice for sports car enthusiasts with a tight budget. Despite being chosen as the official pace car for the Indianapolis 500 in 1984, it went out of production in 1988.

Engine fire complaints, among other reliability concerns, contributed to the downfall of this two-seater, which was tragically marketed as a commuter car. Steer clear of this classic car with serious performance concerns.

Chevrolet Camaro

The Chevrolet Camaro by General Motors is an iconic car. Although the 3rd generation Camaros from 1982 to 1992 are rare vintage cars considered classics by several collectors, they are highly unreliable.

According to the owners, the car has serious engine issues and interior concerns like the troublesome airbag inflators. These reliability concerns make the 3rd generation Chevy Camaro a wrong purchase for a collector.

Cadillac Cimarron

Cadillac is a trusted name when it comes to luxury cars. However, with a 1.8-liter four-cylinder engine, which was underpowered for a luxury vehicle, the Cadillac Cimarron is one of the worst cars by the brand.

This infamous Caddy has made its way to renowned automotive journalist Dan Neil’s list of all-time worst cars. Despite being marketed as a luxury car, Cimarron didn’t offer the quality expected from a Cadillac, undermining its value.

Triumph Stag

The Triumph Stag, produced from 1970 to 1978, is a very unreliable classic car. Although it became popular in car shows, its 3.0-liter V8 engine suffered from overheating due to a poor cooling system. The Stag’s engine used a timing chain susceptible to stretching and breaking, which caused severe engine damage if not addressed promptly.

Moreover, the Stag’s electrical system, typical of many British cars of the era, was unpredictable. The carburetors used in the Stag often needed frequent adjustments and tuning. Hence, the Triumph Stag is an unreliable vehicle despite its attractive design and potential as a classic sports tourer.